Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Garick Hamlin <ghamlin(at)isc(dot)upenn(dot)edu>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling
Date: 2010-01-06 20:20:21
Message-ID: 25646.1262809221@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> Which likely also means 5.6.1 and quite possibly 5.6.0. I don't recommend anything earlier than 5.6.2, though, frankly, and 5.8.9 is a better choice. 5.10.1 better still. Is there a documented required minimum version for PL/Perl?

One of the things on my to-do list for today is to make configure reject
Perl versions less than $TBD. I thought we had agreed a week or so back
that 5.8 was the lowest safe version because of utf8 and other
considerations.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2010-01-06 20:21:34 Re: snapshot generation broken again...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-06 20:17:51 Re: snapshot generation broken again...