Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Garick Hamlin <ghamlin(at)isc(dot)upenn(dot)edu>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling
Date: 2010-01-06 19:53:45
Message-ID: D43FE76E-600E-468F-B599-E6EBC89D3271@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> That's a case of out of date docco more than anything else, AFAIK. It's been there at least since 5.6.2 (which is the earliest source I have on hand).

Which likely also means 5.6.1 and quite possibly 5.6.0. I don't recommend anything earlier than 5.6.2, though, frankly, and 5.8.9 is a better choice. 5.10.1 better still. Is there a documented required minimum version for PL/Perl?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guy Rouillier 2010-01-06 20:08:49 Re: FM format modifier does not remove leading zero from year
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-01-06 19:44:13 Re: Auto-extending table partitions?