Re: _isnan() on Windows

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: _isnan() on Windows
Date: 2018-07-10 20:23:42
Message-ID: 25422.1531254222@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2018-Jul-10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I disagree --- including <float.h> in c.h, as this would have us do,
>> seems like a huge expansion of the visibility of that header. Moreover,
>> doing that only on Windows seems certain to lead to missing-header
>> problems in the reverse direction, ie patches developed on Windows
>> will fail elsewhere.

> I don't think so, because that's only done for MSVC older than 2013.
> Nobody uses that for new development anymore.

Hm. OK, maybe it's all right given that. I'm still a bit worried
about downsides, but no doubt the buildfarm will tell us.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2018-07-10 20:25:19 Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling
Previous Message Jerry Jelinek 2018-07-10 20:15:30 Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling