Re: _isnan() on Windows

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: _isnan() on Windows
Date: 2018-07-10 20:07:03
Message-ID: 20180710200703.44cu47qh2ncgwbtv@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Jul-10, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:

> > Oh, it looks like commits 33a7101281c6, 8e211f539146, 86dbbf20d849
> > (probably others) papered over this by the expedient of adding #include
> > <float.h> to random .c files rather than your patch, which seems the
> > proper fix.
>
> I disagree --- including <float.h> in c.h, as this would have us do,
> seems like a huge expansion of the visibility of that header. Moreover,
> doing that only on Windows seems certain to lead to missing-header
> problems in the reverse direction, ie patches developed on Windows
> will fail elsewhere.

I don't think so, because that's only done for MSVC older than 2013.
Nobody uses that for new development anymore. Downloading versions
prior to 2017 is difficult enough already.

> I think we should stick with the existing coding convention of including
> that only in the specific .c files that need it.

It seems saner to contain the ugliness to a port-specific file, where it
won't pollute two dozen files for no reason.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2018-07-10 20:07:44 Re: GiST VACUUM
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-07-10 19:55:13 Re: _isnan() on Windows