Re: [HACKERS] New array functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New array functions
Date: 2003-09-15 02:52:15
Message-ID: 2529.1063594335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Joe Conway wrote:
>> I'll try to take a look at contrib/intarray and contrib/intagg before
>> the weekend is through, and at least post a recommendation.

> Can I pipe up in int_aggregate.c's defense ?

I don't think we're removing it just yet. The contrib/array stuff
seemed completely obsolete, but intagg isn't.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-15 03:01:29 Re: FreeBSD Thread-safe functions ...
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-15 02:45:25 FreeBSD Thread-safe functions ...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Weiping He 2003-09-15 05:57:05 Re: Chinese NLS patch for 7.4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-14 16:54:58 Re: NLS changes