| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NLS changes |
| Date: | 2003-09-14 16:54:58 |
| Message-ID: | 18378.1063558498@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> plpgsql's .y and .l files need to be considered also
> Translation of loadable modules is completely unchartered territory. If
> someone wants to provide patches to include the strings of some PLs into
> the backend catalog for now, I won't object, but in the future we need a
> better plan.
Agreed, in the long run it would be good for loadable modules to be able
to supply their own message catalogs. In the short run, that isn't
going to happen, so what are the odds of including src/pl (or at least
src/pl/plpgsql) in the set of files scanned to make the backend catalog?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-15 02:52:15 | Re: [HACKERS] New array functions |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-14 16:50:40 | Re: NLS changes |