|From:||Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>|
|To:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Replication status in logical replication|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
> On 30 May 2017, at 19:55, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 5/29/17 22:56, Noah Misch wrote:
>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:33:48AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Looks like a bug that we should fix in PG10, with backpatch to 9.4 (or
>>>> as far as it goes).
>>>> Objections to commit?
>>> Seems we still have this issue. Any update or comment on this? Barring
>>> any objections, I'll add this to the open item so it doesn't get
>> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter,
>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
>> v10 open item, please let us know.
> I would ask Simon to go ahead with this patch if he feels comfortable
> with it.
> I'm disclaiming this open item, since it's an existing bug from previous
> releases (and I have other open items to focus on).
I’m not entirely sure why this was flagged as "Waiting for Author” by the
automatic run, the patch applies for me and builds so resetting back to “Needs
Simon: do you think you will have time to look at this patch in this CF?
|Next Message||Daniel Gustafsson||2017-09-13 00:06:50||Re: Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing|
|Previous Message||Daniel Gustafsson||2017-09-12 23:55:33||Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results|