Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: 2019-02-08 03:35:34
Message-ID: 24520.1549596934@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:15 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I have a mostly-working patch along these lines that I hope to
>> finish up and post tomorrow.

> Do you think that you'll end up pushing the HEAD-only fix shortly?

I have a working patch now, but I think I'm too tired to explain it,
so I'm going to post it tomorrow instead. It's a big enough change
that it might be advisable for someone to review it --- are you
interested?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2019-02-08 03:41:45 RE: speeding up planning with partitions
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2019-02-08 03:34:33 Re: ALTER TABLE on system catalogs