Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: 2019-02-08 02:53:34
Message-ID: CAH2-WznqNNpoJ3srVTQpLmferGA1FuYmNeibn4Xq=bTU7XKZKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:15 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I have a mostly-working patch along these lines that I hope to
> finish up and post tomorrow.

Do you think that you'll end up pushing the HEAD-only fix shortly? It
would be nice to avoid immediate bitrot of an upcoming revision of the
nbtree patch series.

Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2019-02-08 03:04:44 Re: ALTER TABLE on system catalogs
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-02-08 02:39:36 Re: speeding up planning with partitions