Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: 2019-02-08 03:43:15
Message-ID: CAH2-WznaRCm4fSQa9gKftYZb9AFLd9WLNU-PbEnKs_wqhatFmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 7:35 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I have a working patch now, but I think I'm too tired to explain it,
> so I'm going to post it tomorrow instead. It's a big enough change
> that it might be advisable for someone to review it --- are you
> interested?

I'd be happy to review it.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2019-02-08 03:47:37 RE: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2019-02-08 03:41:45 RE: speeding up planning with partitions