Re: Build sizes vs docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Build sizes vs docs
Date: 2009-12-09 16:33:11
Message-ID: 24329.1260376391@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Perhaps we should just add it to the release checklist to verify that
> they are reasonably correct?

Go for it. Now that you mention it, there are some memory-usage tables
in the documentation about shared memory configuration that also have
a pretty short half-life, and should be rechecked.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-12-09 17:03:35 Re: Build sizes vs docs
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-12-09 16:30:11 Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]