Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: robertmhaas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, greg <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, tsutomu <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]
Date: 2009-12-09 16:30:11
Message-ID: 9837222c0912090830wae66260p8d2a954f9754e21e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/12/9 Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
>> > Ok. Your suggestion is very helpfull. In general Tsutomu will wait for
>> > feedbacks come in, probably until Jan 15th.
>>
>> Of course there's also no rule that you couldn't review these sooner -
>> that might help get the ball rolling!
>
> Of course I did before he publishes the patches.  (I and he are
> working for the same company).  However I'm not a Windows programmer
> by no means. So my suggestion was mainly for designs...

:-)

As a reference for the future, please let us know when you have done
this before the patch is submitted. I think it's not very common that
just because you are in the same company, you have reviewed it. For
example, I highly doubt that Heikki reviews all the patches Bruce
post, or the other way around :-) And it's very useful to know that
one set of eyes have been on it already.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-09 16:33:11 Re: Build sizes vs docs
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-12-09 16:17:41 Re: Build sizes vs docs