Re: Build sizes vs docs

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Build sizes vs docs
Date: 2009-12-09 17:03:35
Message-ID: 9837222c0912090903j69e6dd56lbb603ed0c1e29b9a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/12/9 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Perhaps we should just add it to the release checklist to verify that
>> they are reasonably correct?
>
> Go for it.  Now that you mention it, there are some memory-usage tables
> in the documentation about shared memory configuration that also have
> a pretty short half-life, and should be rechecked.

Done.

They're up-to-date per 8.3, btw. Are there changes in 8.4 that should
be put in? If so, it would be good to include it before the next minor
release, so the proper data goes up on the website.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-12-09 17:12:12 Re: Build sizes vs docs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-09 16:33:11 Re: Build sizes vs docs