Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!
Date: 2015-09-24 19:55:08
Message-ID: 24291.1443124508@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> Are there any objections to pginfra standing up bugs.postgresql.org with
> debbugs? Obviously, it'd be more-or-less beta as we play with it, and
> we could set it up as beta-bugs.p.o, if there's concern about that.

I agree with the idea that we don't yet want to give the impression that
this is the official bug tracker. However, "beta-bugs" could give the
impression that it was specifically for bugs about 9.5beta, without
dispelling the idea that it is official. Maybe "bugs-test.p.o"?

(But let's not spend too much time bikeshedding the site name.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2015-09-24 20:06:03 Re: row_security GUC, BYPASSRLS
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2015-09-24 19:45:29 Rename withCheckOptions to insertedCheckClauses