| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Rename withCheckOptions to insertedCheckClauses |
| Date: | 2015-09-24 19:45:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20150924194529.GF3685@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
All,
and this totally should have gone to -hackers instead, sorry about that.
Please ignore the one to -committers, if possible.
Tom, all,
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> My vote would be to rename and reposition the field in HEAD and 9.5
> and accept the corresponding initdb. We already forced an initdb
> since alpha2, so it's basically free as far as testers are concerned,
> and keeping 9.5 in sync with HEAD in this area seems like a really
> good idea for awhile to come.
Alright, attached is an attempt at doing these renames. I went a bit
farther since it seemed to make sense to me (at least at the time, I'm
wondering a bit about it now), so, please provide any thoughts or
feedback you have regarding these changes.
Thanks!
Stephen
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| wco-rename.v1.patch | text/x-diff | 33.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-24 20:08:00 | Re: Rename withCheckOptions to insertedCheckClauses |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-09-24 19:43:58 | Re: pgsql: RLS refactoring |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-24 19:55:08 | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-09-24 19:43:58 | Re: pgsql: RLS refactoring |