Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default?
Date: 2011-10-08 06:04:56
Message-ID: 24232.1318053896@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I would just fix it in head.

> That just seems weird. Either it's cheap enough not to matter (in
> which case there's no reason to revert that change at all) or it's
> expensive enough to matter (in which case presumably we don't want to
> leave it on in 9.1 for the 5 years or so it remains a supported
> release).

It needs to be reverted. I don't understand why you didn't do that
instantly upon the mistake being pointed out to you.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-10-08 06:11:23 Re: [OT?] Time-zone database down [was: Re: timezone buglet?]
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2011-10-08 04:15:32 Re: [OT?] Time-zone database down [was: Re: timezone buglet?]