From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net>, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT?] Time-zone database down [was: Re: timezone buglet?] |
Date: | 2011-10-08 06:11:23 |
Message-ID: | 24315.1318054283@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Facts are not subject to copyright but compilations can be.
> I know it's popular for engineers to play lawyer and I've been guilty
> of it on many an occasion. But in this case I think you're all *way*
> oversimplifying the situation and I don't think it's within our ken to
> be able to come to any clear conclusion.
Well, I'm not a lawyer and I'm certainly not volunteering to be counsel
for Messrs. Olson et al. But I can recognize a troll when I see one.
More to the point, this is an attack on a fundamental piece of open
source infrastructure, and I'm quite sure that a lot of large companies
will be stepping up to help ensure that it stays open.
I feel no need for us to do anything, until and unless there's an
adverse court ruling, which I fully expect there will not be. And
if there is, we won't be the only ones looking for an alternative
solution.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2011-10-08 07:11:08 | Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-08 06:04:56 | Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default? |