| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [bug fix] Savepoint-related statements terminates connection |
| Date: | 2017-09-08 02:11:26 |
| Message-ID: | 23241.1504836686@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 7 September 2017 at 11:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Haas' idea of some kind of syntactic extension, like "LET guc1 = x,
>> guc2 = y FOR statement" seems more feasible to me. I'm not necessarily
>> wedded to that particular syntax, but I think it has to look like
>> a single-statement construct of some kind.
> Always happy to use a good idea... (any better way to re-locate that
> discussion?)
> Requires a new GUC mode for "statement local" rather than "transaction local"
Yeah, something along that line.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2017-09-08 02:21:15 | Re: GnuTLS support |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-08 02:09:21 | Re: [bug fix] Savepoint-related statements terminates connection |