Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert
Date: 2021-06-12 17:01:02
Message-ID: 2321999.1623517262@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I was thinking maybe we could mark all these replication protocol
>> violation errors non-translatable. While we don't want to crash on a
>> protocol violation, it shouldn't really be a user-facing case either.

> I don't see any problem with that as these are not directly related to
> any user operation. So, +1 for making these non-translatable.

Done that way. On re-reading the code, there were a bunch more
Asserts that could be triggered by bad input data, so the committed
patch has rather more corrections than I posted before.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-12 17:07:58 Re: Race condition in recovery?
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-06-12 16:13:15 [PATCH] check_random_seed: use a boolean not an int..