| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert |
| Date: | 2021-06-12 18:43:08 |
| Message-ID: | 202106121843.c4uagunajhpm@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Jun-12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I was thinking maybe we could mark all these replication protocol
> >> violation errors non-translatable. While we don't want to crash on a
> >> protocol violation, it shouldn't really be a user-facing case either.
>
> > I don't see any problem with that as these are not directly related to
> > any user operation. So, +1 for making these non-translatable.
>
> Done that way.
Good call, thanks. Not only it's not very useful to translate such
messages, but it's also quite a burden because some of them are
difficult to translate.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"Tiene valor aquel que admite que es un cobarde" (Fernandel)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2021-06-12 19:01:51 | Avoid stuck of pbgench due to skipped transactions |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-06-12 18:27:43 | Re: A new function to wait for the backend exit after termination |