Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> I have been looking at the isolation tests, and we have in some specs
> steps which are defined but not used in any permutations.
Hmm, might any of those represent actual bugs? Or are they just
leftovers from test development?
> In order to
> detect them, I have been using the attached trick to track which
> permutations are used. This allows to find immediately any
> over-engineered spec by generating diffs about steps defined by not
> used in any permutations. On HEAD, we have six specs entering in this
> category.
Seems like a good idea; I'm surprised we've got so many cases.
regards, tom lane