Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
Date: 2009-07-04 03:56:40
Message-ID: 22554.1246679800@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>>> It seems to be inconsistent. Probably because everything wound up
>>> with the same date, the order is probably more-or-less random.
>>
>> Yeah, I think that's what I'm seeing.

> I think what you guys must be seeing is that the topics are not in
> quite the same order. As far as I can tell, the ordering of patches
> within topics is absolutely identical.

No, what we're complaining about is the ordering of comments for a
single patch. If you look at
http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=2
in some cases there are Comments before the Patch itself, and in
some cases after, but more often than not the original Patch is
at the bottom.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2009-07-04 04:50:03 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-07-04 03:43:00 Round-Robin Reviewers Needed

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2009-07-04 04:50:03 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2009-07-04 03:42:37 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org