Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org

On Jul 3, 2009, at 11:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>>>> It seems to be inconsistent. Probably because everything wound up
>>>> with the same date, the order is probably more-or-less random.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I think that's what I'm seeing.
>
>> I think what you guys must be seeing is that the topics are not in
>> quite the same order. As far as I can tell, the ordering of patches
>> within topics is absolutely identical.
>
> No, what we're complaining about is the ordering of comments for a
> single patch. If you look at
> http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=2
> in some cases there are Comments before the Patch itself, and in
> some cases after, but more often than not the original Patch is
> at the bottom.

Oh, duh. I totally missed that.

...Robert