From: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
Date: | 2009-07-04 04:50:03 |
Message-ID: | 37ed240d0907032150h41de5efay32a1a4f433499fb9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
2009/7/4 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> No, what we're complaining about is the ordering of comments for a
> single patch.
Now moot, since I've successfully pulled the dates for all comments
with a message-id from the archives, and updated the database
accordingly.
Cheers,
BJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-07-04 09:34:09 | Re: single bit integer (TINYINT) revisited for 8.5 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-04 03:56:40 | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jennifer Trey | 2009-07-04 09:44:17 | Re: Group by on %like% |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-04 03:56:40 | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |