Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
Date: 2009-07-04 04:50:03
Message-ID: 37ed240d0907032150h41de5efay32a1a4f433499fb9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

2009/7/4 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> No, what we're complaining about is the ordering of comments for a
> single patch.

Now moot, since I've successfully pulled the dates for all comments
with a message-id from the archives, and updated the database
accordingly.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-07-04 09:34:09 Re: single bit integer (TINYINT) revisited for 8.5
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-07-04 03:56:40 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jennifer Trey 2009-07-04 09:44:17 Re: Group by on %like%
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-07-04 03:56:40 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org