From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Cause TestLib.pm to define $windows_os in all branches. |
Date: | 2015-11-17 19:15:05 |
Message-ID: | 22416.1447787705@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> In general I think we can be a good deal more liberal about backpatching the
>> testing regime than we are with production code, where we are always
>> cautious, and the caution has paid big dividends in our reputation for
>> stability.
> Attached are patches for 9.4 and 9.5 syncing up everything with
> master. I tested both of them on OSX, Linux and Windows (MSVC only
> though using vcregress tapcheck).
I'm not in a position to double-check that these patches work on Windows,
but I reviewed them through the expedient of diff'ing the patched files
against HEAD. The only problem I found was you'd left out the
documentation addition about needing IPC::Run in install-windows.sgml.
So I've pushed them with that fix.
Where do we now stand on invoking the TAP tests in the buildfarm?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-17 20:47:33 | pgsql: Fix possible internal overflow in numeric division. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-17 19:10:35 | pgsql: Back-patch fixes to make TAP tests work on Windows. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-17 19:25:25 | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-17 19:14:28 | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |