| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
| Date: | 2015-11-17 19:14:28 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZnLD4J=M19zYGhBHuarXMW+Ydj-t17-ved+_YB5+ko=g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I honestly don't see what's so confusing about it, and if there is any
> confusion then surely we could make sure what's happening is well
> documented.
+1. I'm actually kind of wondering if we should just back up and
change the way -c works instead, and allow it to be specified more
than once. The current behavior is essentially a crock that has only
backward compatibility to recommend it, and not having two
confusingly-similar options is of some non-trivial value.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-17 19:15:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Cause TestLib.pm to define $windows_os in all branches. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-17 19:10:00 | Re: pg_receivexlog: spurious error message connecting to 9.3 |