Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
Date: 2019-02-04 02:21:05
Message-ID: 20190204022105.GX1881@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:08:03PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> maybe "supertype". It is one char shorter .. somewhere is term
> "supperclass, ..."
>
> In Czech language this term is short, "nadtyp", but probably it is not
> acceptable :)

Moved to next CF.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-04 02:22:09 Re: explain plans with information about (modified) gucs
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-04 02:19:51 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v2] Add and report the new "session_read_only" GUC pseudo-variable.