AW: Big 7.1 open items

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-21 12:48:43
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C605BA5983@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > > CREATE LOCATION tabloc IN '/var/private/pgsql';
> > > CREATE TABLE newtab ... IN tabloc;
> >
> > Okay, so we'd have "table spaces" and "database spaces".
> Seems like one
> > "space" ought to be enough.

Yes, one space should be enough.

>
> Does your "database space" correspond to current PostgreSQL's
> database ?

I think we should think of the "database space" as the default "table space"
for this database.

> And is it different from SCHEMA ?

Please don't mix schema and database, they are two different issues.
Even Oracle has a database, only in Oracle you are limited to one database
per instance. We do not want to add this limitation to PostgreSQL.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-06-21 13:02:40 AW: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-06-21 09:49:26 AW: Big 7.1 open items