Re: proposal \gcsv

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal \gcsv
Date: 2020-04-07 21:47:51
Message-ID: 21709.1586296071@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> út 7. 4. 2020 v 19:27 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
>> Considering this is the last day before v13 feature freeze, should
>> I push this, or sit on it till v14? I feel reasonably good that we
>> have a nice feature definition here, but it's awfully late in the
>> cycle to be designing features.

> I am for pushing to v13. This feature should not to break any, and there is
> lot of time to finish details.

Hearing no objections, pushed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-04-07 22:39:01 Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-07 21:16:58 Re: implicit declaration of datumIsEqual in parse_coerce.c