| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal \gcsv |
| Date: | 2020-04-07 17:30:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAye3Yi4axpM1J6Baw3AMoNrYPdxspAbFvVQwgog4HuUw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
út 7. 4. 2020 v 19:27 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
> Here's a more fully fleshed-out patch, with documentation and some
> test cases. (0001 patch is identical to last time.)
>
> Considering this is the last day before v13 feature freeze, should
> I push this, or sit on it till v14? I feel reasonably good that we
> have a nice feature definition here, but it's awfully late in the
> cycle to be designing features.
>
I am for pushing to v13. This feature should not to break any, and there is
lot of time to finish details.
Regards
Pavel
> regards, tom lane
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-04-07 17:36:21 | Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-04-07 17:29:06 | Re: SLRU statistics |