Re: Time to drop plpython2?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to drop plpython2?
Date: 2021-11-15 18:18:22
Message-ID: 2142324.1637000302@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2021-11-15 12:19:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I was wondering about simply probing to see if python3 exists (and if
>> so, what version it is exactly), as an additional configure test that
>> doesn't hook into anything. That would give us some information without
>> suddenly changing what is being tested.

> But this is probably a good compromise. Were you thinking of doing a proper
> autoconf test or just putting something like python3 --version || true in
> configure?

Hm, I had in mind an actual configure test; but since it's just a
temporary exploratory measure, shortcuts are fine. However, I'm
not sure that what you suggest would result in capturing anything
in config.log.

> I guess it'd be easiest to interpret if we output the current PYTHON version
> and, iff < 3.0, also output the 'python3' version?

We'll already know if PYTHON is set, at least so far as the buildfarm
is concerned.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-11-15 18:34:15 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-11-15 18:12:46 Re: Time to drop plpython2?