From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Document txid functions. |
Date: | 2007-11-05 16:21:05 |
Message-ID: | 21023.1194279665@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Document txid functions.
>>
>> Please revert this change. It makes these functions far more prominent
>> than is justified.
> Have you looked at the output?
Yes, I did. I don't like giving these function their own <sect1>
heading --- if they deserve it, then why not every other little group of
functions under System Information Functions and System Administration
Functions too? I also find it entirely unreasonable to treat the
datatype as a major datatype category.
I thought the stuff was adequately documented already, which is why I
suggest just reverting this.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-11-05 16:22:53 | Re: pgsql: Add a note about another issue that needs to be considered before |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-05 16:10:50 | Re: pgsql: Add a note about another issue that needs to be considered before |