Re: pgsql: Document txid functions.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Document txid functions.
Date: 2007-11-05 16:30:42
Message-ID: 200711051630.lA5GUgb05143@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > Document txid functions.
> >>
> >> Please revert this change. It makes these functions far more prominent
> >> than is justified.
>
> > Have you looked at the output?
>
> Yes, I did. I don't like giving these function their own <sect1>
> heading --- if they deserve it, then why not every other little group of
> functions under System Information Functions and System Administration
> Functions too? I also find it entirely unreasonable to treat the
> datatype as a major datatype category.
>
> I thought the stuff was adequately documented already, which is why I
> suggest just reverting this.

OK, so how about removing just the "Query Function" column. I thought
the field descriptions where useful.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-05 16:35:36 Re: pgsql: Document txid functions.
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-11-05 16:22:53 Re: pgsql: Add a note about another issue that needs to be considered before