| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
| Date: | 2025-10-03 14:41:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1315529.1759502516@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> If you look at this more closely, creating postgres-full.xml and running
> the syntax check perform the same operations, except that the latter
> throws away the output. So it seems redundant to build a whole new code
> path for this. I think you can make the check target dependent on
> postgres-full.xml and be done, kind of like this (starting from
> pre-b2922562726):
Would it be unreasonable to discard the "check" target altogether?
It made sense back in the day when actually building the html docs
took many minutes. But I haven't used it in years, so I wonder
if anyone else has either.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-10-03 14:48:44 | use SIMD in GetPrivateRefCountEntry() |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-10-03 14:16:42 | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |