Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>, Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Date: 2025-06-15 09:13:32
Message-ID: c22ac261-f11e-48a9-bf45-0dea845318ec@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12.06.25 17:28, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Jun-12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> This new code uses the term "TLS" where the rest of PostgreSQL, including
>> the rest of psql, uses the term "SSL". Making this different seems
>> uselessly confusing. I suggest the attached patch to use "SSL" here as
>> well.
>
> Sure, let's do that for now.

done

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2025-06-15 09:50:18 Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2025-06-15 09:00:01 Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly