Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?

From: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Brown <michael(dot)brown(at)discourse(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Date: 2023-10-06 07:50:11
Message-ID: CACG=ezaiHR1CU6zOc0xD_sJdZ8JiQKMLJFohnmyrW4dUR09QPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Back to the patch v11. I don’t understand a bit, what we should do next?
Make a separate thread or put this one on commitfest?

--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kuwamura Masaki 2023-10-06 07:53:20 Re: pg_rewind with cascade standby doesn't work well
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2023-10-06 07:27:22 Re: Use FD_CLOEXEC on ListenSockets (was Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code)