| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age? |
| Date: | 2023-04-11 18:20:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20230411182010.zsldtjrxe5m2bqzp@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-04-11 11:33:01 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:00:48AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I don't know whether others think we should apply it this release, given the
> > "late submission", but I tend to think it's not worth caring the complication
> > of vacuum_defer_cleanup_age forward.
>
> I don't see any utility in waiting; it just makes the process of
> removing it take longer for no reason.
>
> As long as it's done before the betas, it seems completely reasonable to
> remove it for v16.
Added the RMT.
We really should have a rmt(at)pg(dot)o alias...
Updated patch attached. I think we should either apply something like that
patch, or at least add a <warning/> to the docs.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Remove-vacuum_defer_cleanup_age.patch | text/x-diff | 15.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2023-04-11 18:25:30 | [PATCH] Use role name "system_user" instead of "user" for unsafe_tests |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-04-11 17:57:04 | Re: When to drop src/tools/msvc support |