Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
Date: 2023-04-11 16:33:01
Message-ID: ZDWLvS1GghESoX/d@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:00:48AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't know whether others think we should apply it this release, given the
> "late submission", but I tend to think it's not worth caring the complication
> of vacuum_defer_cleanup_age forward.

I don't see any utility in waiting; it just makes the process of
removing it take longer for no reason.

As long as it's done before the betas, it seems completely reasonable to
remove it for v16.

--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-04-11 17:09:36 Re: When to drop src/tools/msvc support
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-04-11 16:23:05 Re: When to drop src/tools/msvc support