Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?
Date: 2022-10-12 19:12:15
Message-ID: 20221012191215.GA1498025@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:13:22AM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> PSA a small patch to tidy a few of the GUC C variables - adding
> comments and removing unnecessary declaration assignments.
>
> make check-world passed OK.

Looks reasonable to me. I've marked this as ready-for-committer.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-10-12 19:19:17 Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure
Previous Message Önder Kalacı 2022-10-12 18:44:06 Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher