Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure
Date: 2022-10-12 19:19:17
Message-ID: fe8a3770-1256-cf96-f3fa-db526fd09568@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12.10.22 20:36, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 02:01:48PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> The patch LGTM. It might be worth removing usages of AssertArg and
>> AssertState, too, but that can always be done separately.
>
> If you are so inclined...

I'm in favor of this. These variants are a distraction.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-10-12 19:27:54 Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2022-10-12 19:12:15 Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?