Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?
Date: 2022-09-28 00:13:22
Message-ID: CAHut+PsWxJgmrAvPsw9smFVAvAoyWstO7ttAkAq8NKDhsVNa3Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:07 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
...

> I will try to post a patch in the new few days to address (per your
> suggestions) some of the variables that I am more familiar with.
>

PSA a small patch to tidy a few of the GUC C variables - adding
comments and removing unnecessary declaration assignments.

make check-world passed OK.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Tidied-some-GUC-C-variable-declarations.patch application/octet-stream 2.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-09-28 00:43:14 Re: Adding a clang-format file
Previous Message Kaiting Chen 2022-09-27 22:50:42 Re: Allow foreign keys to reference a superset of unique columns