Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com
Cc: andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, stark(at)mit(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70
Date: 2022-08-22 02:32:14
Message-ID: 20220822.113214.157880042751504547.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:02:34 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote in
> what about?
>
> +               /*
> +                * Acquire the LWLock directly instead of using
> pg_stat_lock_entry_shared()
> +                * which requires a reference.
> +                */
>
>
> I think that's more consistent with other comments mentioning LWLock
> acquisition.

Sure. Thaks!. I did that in the attached.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Acquire-lock-properly-when-building-stats-snapsho.patch text/x-patch 3.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-08-22 02:35:34 Re: [PATCH] Optimize json_lex_string by batching character copying
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-08-22 00:42:50 Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM