Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com, stark(at)mit(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70
Date: 2022-08-23 03:20:45
Message-ID: 20220823032045.kms7w6ldx5mg2a4e@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-08-22 11:32:14 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:02:34 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote in
> > what about?
> >
> > +               /*
> > +                * Acquire the LWLock directly instead of using
> > pg_stat_lock_entry_shared()
> > +                * which requires a reference.
> > +                */
> >
> >
> > I think that's more consistent with other comments mentioning LWLock
> > acquisition.
>
> Sure. Thaks!. I did that in the attached.

Pushed, thanks!

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-08-23 03:22:21 Re: Considering additional sort specialisation functions for PG16
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2022-08-23 03:03:14 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits