Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Cc: sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case
Date: 2022-01-27 07:24:34
Message-ID: 20220127.162434.876092147237035105.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:31:37 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:13:08PM +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
> > I found the cause for the test failing on window -- is due to the
> > custom archive command setting which wasn't setting the correct window
> > archive directory path.
>
> After reading this patch and this thread, I have noticed that you are
> testing the same thing as Heikki here, patch 0001:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52bc9ccd-8591-431b-0086-15d9acf25a3f@iki.fi
>
> The patch sent on the other thread has a better description and shape,
> so perhaps we'd better drop what is posted here in favor of the other
> version. Thoughts?

pg_switch_wal() is more preferable than filling-in a large number of
records as the means to advance segments because it is stable against
changes of wal_segment_size.

As you said, using has_restoring on initializing node_ptr is simpler
than explicitly setting archive_dir from that of another node.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2022-01-27 07:28:30 Re: row filtering for logical replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-01-27 07:15:01 Re: Proposal: More structured logging