Re: cutting down the TODO list thread

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cutting down the TODO list thread
Date: 2021-07-02 01:23:32
Message-ID: 20210702012332.GD3618@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 05:41:50PM -0400, John Naylor wrote:
> Here I'm just reviewing a couple items in the Sorting section:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Sorting
>
> - Consider whether duplicate keys should be sorted by block/offset
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/23321.1205726381%40sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> It's moot since we started requiring tid as a tiebreaker for btree indexes, so
> I'll just remove this.
>
> - Consider being smarter about memory and external files used during sorts
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1196186626.4246.1078.camel@ebony.site
>
> We've had a large number of improvements in this area since 2007, and it seems
> the ideas in this thread have mostly been done or superseded already. 

Agreed. Please remove them or I can do it.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Schneider 2021-07-02 01:25:58 relation OID in ReorderBufferToastReplace error message
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-07-02 01:10:16 Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression