From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: cutting down the TODO list thread |
Date: | 2021-06-28 21:41:50 |
Message-ID: | CAFBsxsEm142-PEC8yb5v5BXgXVJs-K12Go-FchmZ=2+sM-7yNA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Here I'm just reviewing a couple items in the Sorting section:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Sorting
- Consider whether duplicate keys should be sorted by block/offset
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/23321.1205726381%40sss.pgh.pa.us
It's moot since we started requiring tid as a tiebreaker for btree indexes,
so I'll just remove this.
- Consider being smarter about memory and external files used during sorts
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1196186626.4246.1078.camel@ebony.site
We've had a large number of improvements in this area since 2007, and it
seems the ideas in this thread have mostly been done or superseded already.
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2021-06-28 22:56:29 | Re: Synchronous commit behavior during network outage |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-06-28 20:42:25 | Re: pg14b2: FailedAssertion("_bt_posting_valid(nposting)", File: "nbtdedup.c", ... |