Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance

From: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Date: 2021-03-09 00:20:49
Message-ID: 20210309092049.db22add3e2863c2140290a90@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:42:00 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

>
> On 2/18/21 9:01 PM, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:38:44 +0800
> > Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 9:33 AM Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Attached is a rebased patch (v22a).
> >>>
> >> Thanks for the patch. Will you think posting a patch with the latest commit
> >> at that
> >> time is helpful? If so, when others want to review it, they know which
> >> commit to
> >> apply the patch without asking for a new rebase usually.
> > I rebased the patch because cfbot failed.
> > http://cfbot.cputube.org/
> >
>
> It's bitrotted a bit more dues to commits bb437f995d and 25936fd46c

Thank you for letting me konw. I'll rebase it soon.

>
>
> (A useful feature of the cfbot might be to notify the authors and
> reviewers when it detects bitrot for a previously passing entry.)

+1
The feature notifying it authors seems to me nice.

Regards,
Yugo Nagata

--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-03-09 00:27:58 Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-03-09 00:09:49 Re: Optimising latch signals