| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |
| Date: | 2021-03-08 20:42:00 |
| Message-ID: | 45b2760d-7ee9-0f46-50bf-b15fd440b52f@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/18/21 9:01 PM, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:38:44 +0800
> Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 9:33 AM Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Attached is a rebased patch (v22a).
>>>
>> Thanks for the patch. Will you think posting a patch with the latest commit
>> at that
>> time is helpful? If so, when others want to review it, they know which
>> commit to
>> apply the patch without asking for a new rebase usually.
> I rebased the patch because cfbot failed.
> http://cfbot.cputube.org/
>
It's bitrotted a bit more dues to commits bb437f995d and 25936fd46c
(A useful feature of the cfbot might be to notify the authors and
reviewers when it detects bitrot for a previously passing entry.)
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2021-03-08 20:44:28 | Re: Confusing behavior of psql's \e |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-03-08 20:30:16 | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |