From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Subject: | Re: 64-bit XIDs in deleted nbtree pages |
Date: | 2021-02-19 06:18:08 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoB8T=idEbdFJoHBDgjsO49YggCERJKUhXQ_M-egbjTP-Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:12 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 3:13 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Agreed. Thanks for your explanation.
>
> Attached is v5, which has some of the changes I talked about. Changes
> from v4 include:
>
> * Now only updates metapage during btvacuumcleanup() in the first
> patch, which is enough to fix the existing
> IndexVacuumInfo.num_heap_tuples issue.
>
> * Restored _bt_getbuf() page-from-FSM XID check. Out of sheer paranoia.
>
> * The second patch in the series now respects work_mem when sizing the
> BTPendingRecycle array.
>
> * New enhancement to the XID GlobalVisCheckRemovableFullXid() test
> used in the second patch, to allow it to recycle even more pages.
> (Still unsure of some of the details here.)
Thank you for updating the patch!
>
> I would like to commit the first patch in a few days -- I refer to the
> big patch that makes deleted page XIDs 64-bit/full. Can you take a
> look at that one, Masahiko? That would be helpful. I can produce a bug
> fix for the IndexVacuumInfo.num_heap_tuples issue fairly easily, but I
> think that that should be written after the first patch is finalized
> and committed.
I'll look at the first patch first.
>
> The second patch (the new recycling optimization) will require more
> work and testing.
Then also look at those patches.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Antonin Houska | 2021-02-19 06:40:07 | pg_config_h.in not up-to-date |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-02-19 06:12:54 | Re: progress reporting for partitioned REINDEX |