Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
Date: 2021-02-01 22:57:33
Message-ID: 20210201225733.GD26513@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 06:30:15PM +0100, Antonin Houska wrote:
> Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> > Well, on repeated run of the test I could also hit the first one. I could fix
> > it and will post a new version of the patch (along with some other small
> > changes) this week.
>
> Attached is the next version. Changes done:

Yikes, this patch is 23k lines, and most of it looks like added lines of
code. Is this size expected?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2021-02-01 22:57:36 Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-02-01 22:45:52 Re: Thoughts on "killed tuples" index hint bits support on standby